Issue 6 · Defence Law · Defence & Strategic Technology

Replenishment Must Be Proven Before It Reduces War Stocks

War-stock planning can credit Indian production only at a replenishment rate India has proved.

2 min read

A 1970 Public Accounts Committee report recorded that war-wastage reserves were set with reference to indigenous production, the possibility of diverting manufacturing resources, the time required for that switch-over and the time needed to move stores from production or storage to forward areas. Imported items required deeper reserves when wartime supply could not be assured.

Production credited against the reserve shifts part of readiness from stored inventory to industrial delivery. That credit must rest on output the production chain can sustain.

In 2024, the Comptroller and Auditor General found that propellant factories had repeatedly missed supply targets to ammunition filling factories. Three ammunition types and one rocket worth ₹1,053 crore could not be issued to the Armed Forces mainly because sister factories fell short on propellants worth ₹276 crore.

The constraint sat upstream of final ammunition production. A faster filling line adds no replenishment when propellant supply cannot support it.

The Army's ten-year ammunition roadmap is expanding indigenous sources and manufacturing capacity while building stocks. In 2025–26, indigenisation of 32 import-dependent ammunition variants worth ₹15,899 crore was under way, alongside efforts to establish multiple domestic sources and acquire critical production technologies.

For selected battle-critical munitions, reserve planning must credit that capacity at the replenishment rate the full chain has demonstrated and the time required to reach it.

Nameplate capacity and production targets do not establish that rate. Accepted ammunition delivered through the full chain does.

NATO's 2026 Strategy for Industry-NATO Cooperation calls for exercises with industry to stress-test surge production under heightened-demand and crisis scenarios, alongside strategic reserves and continuous production models.

A crisis exercise can expose assumptions and bottlenecks. A physical replenishment rate requires stronger evidence.

Actual deliveries or a controlled elevated-rate production run can establish that rate without maintaining wartime output in peacetime.

A slower demonstrated industrial response requires more inventory.

Indigenisation changes the war-stock calculation only at the production rate India has proved.

Replenishment must be proven before it reduces war stocks

Issue 6

Dr G. Satheesh Reddy

Feature · Defence & Strategic Technology

Own the Evolution

A defence technology that has been successfully developed has already created strategic technological capability. Dr G Satheesh Reddy asks whether India can then take that technology into production, sustain it through years of service and retain the ability to change it as requirements evolve.

7 Oct 2026 · 2 min read

Ashima Goyal

Leader Blueprint · Capital & Industrial Policy

Finance Must Last Until Capability Is Built

Long-cycle strategic investment can take years before returns arrive. For Ashima Goyal, the financing challenge is whether capital can stay committed through that period at a cost the project can bear.

7 Oct 2026 · 3 min read

Leader Blueprint · Defence & Strategic Technology

Defence Indigenisation Must Close the Process Capability Gap

India’s defence sector has moved rapidly on indigenisation. More than 15,700 defence items have been indigenised through SRIJAN over the past five years, with estimated import substitution of about ₹9,000 crore. In August, another 405 strategically important items were placed on the Department of Defence Production’s sixth Positive Indigenisation List.

7 Oct 2026 · 3 min read

Leader Blueprint · Defence & Strategic Technology

Defence Sovereignty Requires Design Continuity

Lieutenant General P.R. Shankar, former Director General of Artillery, argues that India’s next defence-industrial test begins after induction: whether field use improves the system, known faults are corrected and the learning reaches the weapon that follows.

7 Oct 2026 · 5 min read

N. Manoharan, Director General of the Directorate General of Quality Assurance

Leader Blueprint · Defence & Strategic Technology

In Defence Production, Quality Is Repeatability

N. Manoharan, Director General of the Directorate General of Quality Assurance, argues that defence-manufacturing capability is established when proven performance can be reproduced across production batches, suppliers and years of use.

7 Oct 2026 · 3 min read

Feature · Defence & Strategic Technology

The Drawing Is Not the Factory

India can transfer defence production into industry. The handover is proven when the approved design changes—and industry carries the engineering.

8 Oct 2026 · 4 min read

Defence Law · Defence & Strategic Technology

Indigenisation Closes at Qualified Use

A critical defence material is not indigenised because India can produce it. The Indian production route must be qualified for the military application that depends on it.

8 Oct 2026 · 1 min read

Defence Law · Defence & Strategic Technology

Indigenisation Must Reach the Support Chain

Su-30MKI production moved into India before its support chain did.

8 Oct 2026 · 2 min read